When speaking in regards to
the Ice caps of our North and South Poles respectively, there is clearly a
difference of outcomes that need to be mentioned. First, the South Pole and the ice that makes
up Antarctica. If it were to melt, sea
levels would rise more than 200 feet (61 meters). In my opinion, the reason for this is due to
the sizes of caps in length, width, and mass.
It seems to be a difficult task of maintaining this information as the
top of most Ice Caps is an illusion, as far as the size below.
The North Pole is slightly
different because “the ice is not as thick and actually floats so if the Arctic
Ocean melted, it would not affect sea levels. The ice on Greenland, however,
would be more likely to melt because it is closer to the equator and its
temperatures are higher www.curiousity.discovery.com
).” If melted, sea levels would raise
about 20 feet (6 meters). This was very
confusing to me as before starting the experiment my results from reading what
was needed, I was certain the water would overflow the glass after melting,
which it did not. For a second chance
result I will try the experiment again this week, searching for an increase of
water to the top or maybe even overflowing.
My question to this
experiment while searching for different results next week concerns the amount
of ice and water I place into the glass.
What would happen if I were to use a larger piece of ice mimicking our
South Pole instead of the smaller pieces used in the first experiment showing
relation to our North Pole? Also, the
amount of water place inside the glass.
Would there be a significant change in levels if I were to place more
water in the glass? How much with less? How
much difference in levels would there be?
Resources
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of
inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29.
Use the Education Research Complete database and search using the article’s title.
Use the Education Research Complete database and search using the article’s title.
Trefil, J., & O'Brien-Trefil, W. (2009). The science
students need to know. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 28–33.
No comments:
Post a Comment